Dear Blake: What the hell are you thinking?

Dear Blake;

1. Why was the Communications Planning Group not copied on the Pivot Legal Press Release?
2. What committee of Council did this go through?
3. What motion at Council approved the filing of a complaint to the UN with the AMS name on it?
4. What legal counsel, Pivot or (hopefully) otherwise, have we retained for this complaint, and if so, how much is this costing us?
5. If the answers to 2 and 3 are “Nothing”, how could you possibly think that this was appropriate?
6. Are you or one of your agents bringing the Disabilities Seat motion back to Council?
7. If the answer to 6 is “Yes”, do you realize that the motion failed by 2/3, that 11 votes would have to swing for passage, and that bringing this forward is a recipe for both another long meeting, hurt feelings, the exploitation of students with real concerns by a politically motivated Equity Office, and crying?
8. Are you comfortable showing this level of disrespect to Council?

I am posting these to the Tribune, and will post your response unedited.

Regards;