pater noster, qui es in Old Admin

Today’s editorial, “UBC shows AMS  who’s daddy” in the Ubyssey is hogwash. Slop. A half formed Pavlova. A fallen soufflé. And it bothers me most because I can’t respond to it (and, actually, don’t know if I can actually tell you why I can’t respond, but I’m sure you can guess). It’s unfair to the subjects of the article, who operate in an obscured context, and to the writers, who couldn’t possibly know the full story.

I have never been a close ideological ally of our President – I’m sure that on that, everyone can agree. I’ve voted against him as much as not, and I’ve heard tell that the First Lady blames me for the whole disqualification debacle (which, by the way, was not a Naylor initiative). The same could be said of our VP Admin, of whom, as you may recall, I was not a proponent.

I respect and admire the job that Crystal and Blake have been doing on SUB negotiations. They should keep up the good work.


0 Responses to “pater noster, qui es in Old Admin”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Voter Funded Media

Blogathon Button
October 2009
« Sep   Nov »

RSS RBT Twitter

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License, except for the exclusive commercial use of participating in the Voter Funded Media competition.

%d bloggers like this: