26
Nov
09

Dear Blake: What the hell are you thinking?

Dear Blake;

  1. Why was the Communications Planning Group not copied on the Pivot Legal Press Release?
  2. What committee of Council did this go through?
  3. What motion at Council approved the filing of a complaint to the UN with the AMS name on it?
  4. What legal counsel, Pivot or (hopefully) otherwise, have we retained for this complaint, and if so, how much is this costing us?
  5. If the answers to 2 and 3 are “Nothing”, how could you possibly think that this was appropriate?
  6. Are you or one of your agents bringing the Disabilities Seat motion back to Council?
  7. If the answer to 6 is “Yes”, do you realize that the motion failed by 2/3, that 11 votes would have to swing for passage, and that bringing this forward is a recipe for both another long meeting, hurt feelings, the exploitation of students with real concerns by a politically motivated Equity Office, and crying?
  8. Are you comfortable showing this level of disrespect to Council?

I am posting these to the Tribune, and will post your response unedited.

Regards;

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Voter Funded Media

Blogathon Button
November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

RSS RBT Twitter

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License, except for the exclusive commercial use of participating in the Voter Funded Media competition.

%d bloggers like this: